Delegates at the national convention of the Conservative Party in Calgary overwhelmingly approved a law resembling “stand your ground,” allowing individuals to use lethal force to defend against intruders in their homes. Numerous policies, mainly concerning crime, immigration, and social issues, were debated and adopted at the biannual event.
After giving party leader Pierre Poilievre a strong endorsement, members renewed their policy agenda in preparation for a potential upcoming federal election. Delegates emphasized the importance of Poilievre ruling out further drug decriminalization, enhancing bail regulations, and implementing stricter laws to combat intimate partner violence.
Over 90% of delegates called for a return to “meritocracy” by eliminating diversity, equity, and inclusion programs. Additionally, about 77% of delegates, despite some opposition from Quebec, supported defunding CBC/Radio-Canada.
Immigration was a major focus, with approximately 77% of delegates backing a policy to expedite the deportation of non-citizens convicted of serious crimes, along with imposing a default permanent ban on re-entry and asset forfeiture for foreign criminals. The convention also highlighted the need for tighter immigration rules, enhanced border security measures, and asylum system reforms.
While most policies were approved by significant margins, a division arose over a resolution opposing the existing ban on conversion therapy. Former leader Erin O’Toole allowed the resolution to pass unchallenged, despite internal party tensions.
A proposal to enhance self-defense laws garnered strong support, with 91% of delegates endorsing the measure. The policy aims to shield individuals from prosecution when defending their homes against intruders, addressing concerns raised by a recent case in Ontario. Poilievre advocated for a “castle law” to empower Canadians to protect their families from home invasions.
Furthermore, delegates demanded increased grassroots involvement in candidate selection processes, pushing for local officials to have more influence in nominating candidates for the party. These changes reflect a desire for more transparency and autonomy within the Conservative Party’s structure.
The amendments follow allegations of centralized decision-making by national party officials, leading to disputes over candidate nominations in various electoral districts. The party has faced criticism for perceived interference in local nomination processes, prompting calls for greater accountability and fairness in candidate selection.
