A bill proposed by the New Democratic Party (NDP) aiming to restrict Canadian military exports to the U.S. without permits could receive backing from over a dozen Liberal Members of Parliament when it comes to a vote on Wednesday. This potential support from Liberals would mark a significant departure from the government’s stance under Prime Minister Mark Carney.
During a press conference on Tuesday, NDP’s Jenny Kwan, the primary sponsor of the bill, stated that an estimated nine to 16 Liberal MPs might lend their support to the legislation. Two Liberal MPs, who preferred to remain anonymous, verified this potential range during discussions with CBC News.
Thus far, four Liberal MPs have publicly endorsed Bill C-233, also known as the No More Loopholes Act, which seeks to regulate the export of arms and munitions to the U.S. by implementing stricter controls similar to those in place for other nations. The NDP argues that Canadian weapons sent to the U.S. can end up being redirected to other countries, citing instances involving Sudan and Israel.
Liberal MP Salma Zahid, one of the supporters of the bill, emphasized during a recent parliamentary debate that the legislation aims to ensure Canada upholds its international obligations and that its defense industries act responsibly in the global arms trade. The bill is framed as a measure against complicity in civilian violence, rather than being anti-industry or anti-Canadian defense sector.
While the NDP is open to amendments to the bill, no concrete suggestions have been put forth by Liberal MPs beyond the removal of language concerning the U.S. The government contends that the current exemption for the U.S. is not a loophole but a strategic decision to enhance defense cooperation with a key ally.
If more than a dozen Liberal MPs lend their support to the NDP bill, it would signify the first instance of members of Prime Minister Mark Carney’s caucus diverging from the government’s stance on legislation since his tenure began. The potential shift in support has sparked varied opinions, with some arguing that the bill could strain Canada’s relationship with the U.S. and jeopardize Canadian jobs, while others view it as a necessary step to uphold international obligations and prevent arms diversion to conflict regions.
The Bloc Québécois has voiced concerns about the bill being overly broad and potentially detrimental to industries affected by American tariffs. However, the party also highlighted the practical challenges of expecting the U.S. to seek Canada’s approval for arms shipments, indicating that such an expectation may not align with reality.
As the vote approaches, the stance of Liberal MPs and the potential implications of their support for the bill remain subjects of significant debate and scrutiny within Canadian political circles.
