The term “rules-based international order” gained popularity among Canadian leaders in 2017. Though not poetic, it symbolized the network of global organizations established post-World War II, backed by American influence, fostering a period of relative peace and stability for many nations. Surprisingly, from 1995 to 2016, this phrase was absent in the House of Commons discussions until it resurfaced in debates post-2016, reflecting concerns over the impact of the Trump presidency.
The G7 summit in Charlevoix, Quebec, in June 2018 highlighted the struggle to acknowledge the rules-based international order in the final communique, illustrating the increasing uncertainty surrounding the established global order. Mark Carney’s recent speech at Davos urged middle powers to face the reality of a world where power rivalry overshadows the idealistic concept of a rules-based system.
Carney’s address marked a significant shift in Canadian foreign policy, resonating with a desire for truth amidst global uncertainties. His call for middle powers to act collectively echoed Benjamin Franklin’s historical appeal for unity. As Canada navigates its role in this evolving landscape, the balance between hard power commitments and diplomatic challenges unfolds.
Beyond rhetoric, Carney’s message triggers expectations for tangible actions, especially in dealing with the changing dynamics, vulnerabilities, and crises on the horizon. While Carney’s focus on international relations garners attention, his domestic agenda also plays a crucial role in shaping Canada’s response to the shifting global order. The challenges ahead demand a resilient Canadian society to navigate the complexities of an uncertain world.
